What should you do after you're involved in a car accident?

Published on
October 1, 2020
Written by
Angel Murphy, Esq.
Category
Videos

Picture this: You find yourself at the nearest urgent care mere minutes or hours after the accident. Here's the game plan I suggest: Approach the medical staff and calmly explain every intricate detail of the incident. Yes, every single one! Let them know how the accident unfolded, step by step

By way of example, mention that you were patiently waiting at a red light, attentively watching the road. The light hadn't turned green yet when suddenly, out of nowhere, you heard a thunderous thump from behind. Your car jerked forward, causing your head to collide with the steering wheel, and the seat belt tightened, momentarily trapping your arm.

Now, why is this level of articulation essential? Well, when your doctor hears this detailed account, they can make informed decisions. In order to assess the situation and determine the extent of the impact on your head and potential injury caused by the tightened seat belt, they may conduct thorough evaluations and arrange for necessary X-rays for your head and arm. They need the full picture to provide appropriate treatment and establish a consistent narrative throughout your medical journey.

You see, after a car accident, injuries sometimes remain hidden and may not manifest until days or even weeks later. Shock plays a significant role in this, as your body's natural response may conceal certain injuries. You might experience light-headedness, mood swings, headaches, or other symptoms. It's crucial to inform your doctor about these changes, ensuring they have a comprehensive understanding of your condition for accurate treatment recommendations.

Remember, this level of detail goes beyond a simple mention of being rear-ended. Share how long you waited at the red light, the force you experienced, if your head was affected, and if the seat belt or any other factor caused more problems. The personal and intimate insights that you share will be recorded in your medical records, serving as the cornerstone of your case as you pursue compensation for your injuries.

Effectively communicating your injuries to your doctor serves two important purposes. Firstly, it helps in your own recovery process as the doctor will be better equipped to provide the necessary treatment. Secondly, it strengthens your legal case by clearly establishing the negligence of the other party involved. By describing your injuries accurately and providing all relevant information, you are taking a proactive step towards ensuring the best possible outcome both medically and legally. So, it's vital to have this candid conversation with your doctor, knowing that they will document your statements and share them with subsequent medical professionals.

Allow The Murphy Law Firm to work in your favor! Contact my office today!
☎️ 240-493-9116
🌐 www.amurphylegal.com
➡️ https://Bookme.name/amurphylegal//

Angel Murphy

Personable. Passionate. Persistent.

The Murphy Law Firm, Trial Strategy Meeting, The Murphy Law Firm Initial Consultation, The Murphy Law Firm Intake, Intake Process, Angel Murphy, Attorney Angel Murphy, Esq, amurphylegal, divorce attorney, family law, maryland family law, maryland divorce attorney, maryland family attorney

Subscribe to our newsletter

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Articles & Resources

March 4, 2024

Rudnick v. Rudnick (2023) & Unconscionability in Maryland Prenuptial Agreements

In Rudnick v. Rudnick (2023), a prenuptial agreement signed in 1992 became the subject of dispute during the couple's divorce in 2019. The agreement, which prohibited the division of assets or alimony, was initially considered fair but was deemed unconscionable at the time of enforcement. Massachusetts law, where the case arose, applied an unconscionability analysis at the time of enforcement. The courts ruled in favor of the wife, highlighting the importance of skilled legal representation well-versed in relevant state laws.

April 1, 2024

Carrington v. Richards (2017) & the Role of Participation in Custody Modification

In Carrington v. Richards (2017), a custody battle turned tragic due to the mother's failure to participate in court proceedings. Initially seeking full custody of their son, the father was awarded sole custody when the mother failed to appear at the final hearing. Despite subsequent attempts to overturn the decision, the mother's non-compliance with court orders and absence from proceedings hindered her case. Ultimately, the father's custody was affirmed, but the case took a devastating turn when the mother shot and wounded the father. This case underscores the importance of active participation in custody proceedings and the serious consequences of non-compliance.

March 29, 2024

Wiles v. Wiles (2017) & Modifying Alimony to Obtain a Longer Payment Period

In Wiles v. Wiles (2017), a divorced couple faced a dispute over alimony modification. Initially granted alimony for a limited duration, the ex-wife sought to extend the payments indefinitely and increase the monthly amount. Despite the ex-husband's opposition, the trial court granted the modification based on the ex-wife's claim of a change in circumstances. On appeal, the appellate division upheld the decision, emphasizing the need for a "material" change in circumstances to justify altering the alimony award, which would otherwise result in a harsh or inequitable outcome.

March 22, 2024

Hernandez v. Matiendo (2017) & the Impact of Previous Litigation on Visitation Modification

In family law, while the concept of "double jeopardy" may not apply, courts generally avoid relitigating settled issues without a change in circumstances. This principle was highlighted in the case of Hernandez v. Matiendo (2017), where a mother sought to modify a visitation order established in a Puerto Rican court. Despite her claims of sexual abuse, the Maryland court upheld the original order, emphasizing that the issue had already been litigated in Puerto Rico.

March 25, 2024

Mullen v. Robbins (2017) & How Settlement Agreements Impact Alimony Modification

In the case of Mullen v. Robbins (2017), a high-earning physician learned the importance of careful contract language when dealing with private agreements during divorce. Despite reaching a private agreement on alimony, the ex-wife sought modification in court citing a change in circumstances due to health issues. The trial court ruled in her favor, emphasizing the need for a "material change in circumstances" to modify private agreements. The appellate division upheld the ruling, highlighting the importance of precise contract language in determining modifiability.