Legal Do's and Don'ts after a Car Accident

Published on
June 22, 2020
Written by
Angel Murphy, Esq.
Category
Videos

Let's dive into the details!

  1. Do Call the Police: Regardless of the severity of the accident, it is advisable to call the police. They can create an official report that will be essential for any future legal proceedings. This report will document important details about the incident, which may prove crucial in your case.
  2. Do Exchange Information: Exchange contact and insurance information with the other driver involved in the accident. Gather details such as their name, phone number, address, insurance company, policy number, and vehicle information. This information will be valuable when filing a claim or seeking legal representation.
  3. Do Seek Medical Attention: Even if you feel fine initially, it is essential to seek medical attention promptly. Some injuries may not manifest immediately, and a thorough examination can help identify any underlying issues. Seek treatment from an urgent care facility, emergency room, or your primary care doctor to ensure your well-being.
  4. Do Document the Scene: Take pictures of the accident scene, including the damage to both vehicles involved. These visual records can serve as valuable evidence when dealing with insurance companies or pursuing legal action. Additionally, if there were witnesses, try to obtain their contact information, as their statements may be beneficial later on.
  5. Don't Admit Fault: Avoid admitting fault or engaging in discussions about fault with the other driver. Instead, wait for the police to arrive and provide them with factual information when they ask for it. Discussing fault at the scene can potentially complicate matters and may not accurately reflect the situation.
  6. Don't Delay Medical Attention: After an accident, don't postpone seeking medical attention. Prompt medical care is crucial not only for your well-being but also for establishing a link between the accident and any injuries sustained. Delaying treatment can weaken your claim and undermine your chances of receiving fair compensation.
  7. Don't Speak to Insurance Companies Alone: Insurance companies may contact you shortly after the accident to gather information. It is important to remember that their interests lie in minimizing their liability. It is best to consult with an experienced attorney who can guide you through the process and protect your rights during any interactions with insurance companies.

Navigating the aftermath of a car accident requires a clear understanding of the legal do's and don'ts. By following the right steps, such as calling the police, exchanging information, seeking medical attention, and documenting the scene, you can protect your rights and strengthen your case. Avoid common mistakes, including admitting fault and speaking to insurance companies without legal representation.

Allow The Murphy Law Firm to work in your favor! ‍

Contact my office today!

☎️ 240-493-9116

🌐 www.amurphylegal.com

➡️ https://Bookme.name/amurphylegal//

Angel Murphy

Personable. Passionate. Persistent.

Car Accident, Legal Do's and Don'ts, Protecting Your Rights, Police Report, Exchanging Information, Seeking Medical Attention, Documenting the Scene, Admitting Fault, Insurance Companies, Legal Representation, Murphy Law, The Murphy Law Firm, Trial Strategy Meeting, The Murphy Law Firm Initial Consultation, The Murphy Law Firm Intake, Intake Process, Angel Murphy, Attorney Angel Murphy, Esq, Amurphylegal, divorce attorney, family law, Maryland family law, Maryland divorce attorney, Maryland family attorney

Subscribe to our newsletter

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Articles & Resources

March 4, 2024

Rudnick v. Rudnick (2023) & Unconscionability in Maryland Prenuptial Agreements

In Rudnick v. Rudnick (2023), a prenuptial agreement signed in 1992 became the subject of dispute during the couple's divorce in 2019. The agreement, which prohibited the division of assets or alimony, was initially considered fair but was deemed unconscionable at the time of enforcement. Massachusetts law, where the case arose, applied an unconscionability analysis at the time of enforcement. The courts ruled in favor of the wife, highlighting the importance of skilled legal representation well-versed in relevant state laws.

April 1, 2024

Carrington v. Richards (2017) & the Role of Participation in Custody Modification

In Carrington v. Richards (2017), a custody battle turned tragic due to the mother's failure to participate in court proceedings. Initially seeking full custody of their son, the father was awarded sole custody when the mother failed to appear at the final hearing. Despite subsequent attempts to overturn the decision, the mother's non-compliance with court orders and absence from proceedings hindered her case. Ultimately, the father's custody was affirmed, but the case took a devastating turn when the mother shot and wounded the father. This case underscores the importance of active participation in custody proceedings and the serious consequences of non-compliance.

March 29, 2024

Wiles v. Wiles (2017) & Modifying Alimony to Obtain a Longer Payment Period

In Wiles v. Wiles (2017), a divorced couple faced a dispute over alimony modification. Initially granted alimony for a limited duration, the ex-wife sought to extend the payments indefinitely and increase the monthly amount. Despite the ex-husband's opposition, the trial court granted the modification based on the ex-wife's claim of a change in circumstances. On appeal, the appellate division upheld the decision, emphasizing the need for a "material" change in circumstances to justify altering the alimony award, which would otherwise result in a harsh or inequitable outcome.

March 22, 2024

Hernandez v. Matiendo (2017) & the Impact of Previous Litigation on Visitation Modification

In family law, while the concept of "double jeopardy" may not apply, courts generally avoid relitigating settled issues without a change in circumstances. This principle was highlighted in the case of Hernandez v. Matiendo (2017), where a mother sought to modify a visitation order established in a Puerto Rican court. Despite her claims of sexual abuse, the Maryland court upheld the original order, emphasizing that the issue had already been litigated in Puerto Rico.

March 25, 2024

Mullen v. Robbins (2017) & How Settlement Agreements Impact Alimony Modification

In the case of Mullen v. Robbins (2017), a high-earning physician learned the importance of careful contract language when dealing with private agreements during divorce. Despite reaching a private agreement on alimony, the ex-wife sought modification in court citing a change in circumstances due to health issues. The trial court ruled in her favor, emphasizing the need for a "material change in circumstances" to modify private agreements. The appellate division upheld the ruling, highlighting the importance of precise contract language in determining modifiability.